MMDA
Chair Bayani Fernando
Antihero?
by Alicor Panao
No
doubt, Metro Manila Development Authority Chairman Bayani Fernando remains
the most popular of President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyos recent
appointments. As Marikina mayor he caught the nations imagination
when he was able to transform his metropolis into the cleanest and most
orderly of Metro Manila cities. Now the hero is once again
receiving public attention in his recent campaign to rid the sidewalks
of vendors and other obstructions.
Vending on public property is a crime punishable
with imprisonment, said the former mayor who was known for his
strict implementation of the law. Earlier, he called on the sidewalk
vendors to rent the vacant stalls in markets as an alternative site
for their trade. But the sidewalk vendors refused, saying they can ill
afford the rentals.
Stern on its clearing operations, it did not take long
for the MMDA to earn the resentment of urban poor groups, vendors, a
number of peoples organizations, and even local officials and
some members of Congress. All these, ironically, in an effort to provide
a better traffic flow in the Metro.
We are not criminals, points out Metro Manila Vendors Association
President Pedring Fadrigon, we are simply fighting for our livelihood.
Iloilo representative Augusto Syjuco criticized Fernandos oppressive
anti-vending policy and urged him to resign.
In the course of its campaign, the MMDA has gone to
the extent of pouring kerosene to the street vendors wares to
discourage them from reoccupying the streets. The solon reportedly vowed
to gather nine million signatures to oust Fernando from office should
he continue to ignore the vendors demand for a lenient
enforcement of the law. Bayan Muna Secretary General Nathaniel Santiago,
on the other hand, calls the MMDAs policy as illegal, unjust
and inhuman and accused its chair of grave abuse of authority
in its implementation.
Surprisingly, however, majority seems to be throwing
their overwhelming support tor what Fernando is doing. A random text
poll in one episode in Debate, for instance, showed 82%
of its viewers supportive of Fernandos campaign. A Peyups.com
poll of students supposedly the most vocal of demographic groupings
likewise produced a similar verdict, giving Fernando an 87.10%
approval rating. Groups like the Federation of Regional Development
Councils agree with Fernando that the clearing of sidewalks will optimize
the use of existing roadways and decongest traffic in many areas of
the metropolis. Metro Manila mayors also rallied behind the MMDA chairs
programs and hit some politicians who were taking advantage of the vendor
issue to gain political mileage.
The issue is clear, said Metro Manila Mayors
league spokesperson Mayor Wenceslao Trinidad of Pasay, and it
is all about the mayors, the vendors and the Metropolitan Development
Authority. Politicans obviously riding on the issue would
only complicate things, warned the mayor.
Fernandos logic is simple. The streets belong
to the public and no one has the right to appropriate them for him/herself.
Sidewalk stalls are obstructions so they have to be removed.
And the sidewalks will be cleared of parked vehicles
too, the MMDA chair added, but first things first.
Some groups, however, equate Fernandos campaign
as a government-orchestrated battle of the rich against the poor. Urban
poor groups backed by militants are reportedly gathering forces against
Fernando who they regard as their common enemy.
Our political divisions should not prevent us
from moving toward our common goal, that is to stop Fernandos
ruthless policies against the poor, said Don Pangan of Sanlakas
in a newspaper report. They complain that they have nowehere else to
go because rentals inside public markets are beyond their reach.
Groups like Sanlakas, Metro Manila Vendors Alliance,
Damayang Mahihirap (Kadamay), the Urban Poor Associates and the Urban
Poor Colloquium have agreed to stage regular but separate rallies until
Fernando gives in to their demands.
But Fernando is not giving in to the pressure and has
opted instead to demonstrate to the vendors that it is actually cheaper
to do business inside public markets. With rentals that range
from only 29 to 50 pesos a day, according to Fernando, this is actually
less than what illegal vendors are paying to extortionists like some
corrupt policemen and baranggay officials.
Despite MMDAs clearing drive, vendors obstinately return to the
sidewalks to peddle their goods. This is driven not really by extreme
poverty, said Fernando, but by the very dynamics of the market. The
most accessible stalls are those near the streets, he explained, and
the sidewalk vendors are making the most out of them for free.
Customers buy from the sidewalk vendors not only for
convenience but also for cheaper goods. What people do not realize,
said Fernando, is that they are being cheated in terms of quality and
quantity of goods.
Sidewalk vendors dont just break the law,
reasoned Fernando, they steal from legitimate market vendors who
have licenses and are paying taxes. They are also guilty of economic
sabotage, according to Fernando. Just imagine the man-hours lost,
and the billions of pesos in business opportunities foregone because
of traffic delayed congested streets and sidewalks.
Danilo Arao, who teaches journalism at the UP College
of Mass Communication is not questioning Fernandos motives. He,
however, is not convinced of the MMDA chairs logic. There
is nothing wrong with telling them (sidewalk vendors) to look for alternative
means of livelihood, but concrete options must be provided to them,
he emphasized. The phenomenon of street vending, after all, is
a sign of the growing underground economy and the lack of viable job
opportunities for the people.
Taking a similar tact, Urban Poor Associate Executive
Director Denis Murphy asks, Is it fair to implement laws that
penalize the poor when the laws that would have provided solutions for
them are not implemented? He said that for every law forbidding
poor families to stay in private or government lands illegally, there
are laws, such as the Urban Development and Housing Act, that are not
being pushed but clearly instruct local government officials to set
aside land for the poor so that they will not resort to squatting. The
problem, he said, cannot be solved through a selective application of
the law but by a clear understanding of the issues from the poor persons
side.
But even if all of them (sidewalk vendors) are
poor, wrote UP Economic Professor Solita Monsod in a column, it
is ridiculous to think that those they inconvenience are all non-poor.
Monsod lauds Fernandos public approval rating as a heartening
sign that people do not bring the anti poor charges against Fernando.
This indicates that more and more poverty is no longer accepted
as an excuse for breaking the law, said Monsod, which means
that we might be beginning to have a discerning rational public.
All told, Bayani Fernandos strong reform moves
have certainly placed him in the limelight. But in a country notoriously
known for soft takes on regulations, Fernandos strict implementation
of the law is in itself noteworthy.
For those still complaining, Pasay Mayor Wenceslao Trinidad
offers this for the taking. We should not leave everything to
Fernando, he proposed. Instead, we should also do our part
to ensure that our sidewalks would be free from illegal vendors and
obstructions. (Alicor Panao)