|
Letter from
the President
Ibagsak ang Digital Imperialism
Ni Dr.
Francisco Nemenzo
I-Filipino
natin ito para di maintindihan ni Bill Gates.
Ayon sa Kule, maraming ayaw lumipat sa Linux kahit ipaliwanag nating
pinapabayad tayo ng P8,000 bawat computer para sa subscription sa
Windows. Bakit daw pahirapan sila? Sanay na sila sa Windows programs
at sayang ang kanilang mahalagang oras kung mag-aaral pa ng bagong
programa. May katamaran din talagang matuto ng bago. Bukod dito,
katwiran nila na tungkulin daw ng sabwatang US-Arroyo na isubsidize
ang edukasyon.
Kung gusto talaga ng isang departamento na gumamit ng Microsoft
Office, hindi namin sila pinipilit. Pero sila ang bahalang mag-install
ng Windows OS sa kanilang computer. Di nila mapapakinabangan ang
network dahil unti-unti na itong ililipat sa Linux. At kung mahuli
sila ng mga tauhan ni Bill Gates, huwag silang humingi ng pambayad
sa multa.
Ang isyu ay hindi lang economic (pagtitipid), kundi political din
(paglaya sa digital imperialism). Linux is the antidote to monopolistic
control. It is truly liberative and empowering. Liberative because
it is so designed that it cannot be locked in by a giant company
that wants to carve out a captive market. Empowering because, being
open source, it allows users to modify and improve on any program.
Of course, the economic issue is important. Libre kasi ito. Walang
hahabol sa atin dahil sa paglabag ng Intellectual Property Rights
ng WTO. Years ago, when I was writing a column for the Philippine
Daily Globe and, later, for the Manila Times, I defended software
piracy as “the revenge of the Third World.” Now that is not necessary
because Linux has opened up an alternative for proprietary software.
Nangatuwiran si Bill Gates noon na kailangang bayaran ang software
dahil wala nang magsisikap na pahusayin pa ito kung aalisin ang
profit motive. Linux is the answer to this capitalist argument.
Marami nang magagaling at napakagandang software ang nasulat para
sa Linux, at ang mga ito ay libre din. This has created a market
that Bill Gates cannot corner.
Dahil open source ang Linux at lahat ng mga programang nakasalalay
dito, madali natin at malaya tayong i-reconfigure ito. Pwede nating
iayon ito sa ating partikular na pangangailangan. At pwede pa nating
dagdagan ng mga bagong feature. Ganito ang batayan sa kultura ng
Linux community: Lahat ay magtulungan para paghusayin pa lalo ang
mga programa.
Hindi ito maaring gawin sa mga programa ng Microsoft. Karamihan
sa atin ay nasasanay lamang na gumamit sa kanilang mga default function.
Oo nga, maari itong i-reconfigure pero limitado ang mga opsyon na
inaalok.
Totoo na mas kumplikado ang Linux-based programs. Kung talagang
matatalino ang mga taga UP, napakadaling matutunan ng Linux. Para
sa amin na dumaan muna sa WordStar, naranasan namin ang proseso
ng paglipat sa Microsoft Word. Mas mahirap ang adjustment na iyon.
Pero ang StarOffice, OpenOffice, Linux Bayanihan, etc. ay tulad
din ng Microsoft Office na menu-driven at user-friendly.
Linux Bayanihan is a package of Linux-based programs developed by
ASTI (Advanced Science and Technology Institute) – a unit of DOST
based in our Diliman campus, along C. P. Garcia Avenue. To promote
Linux, it tries to overcome the valid criticism that Linux is difficult
to install. With Bayanihan, it takes only three keystrokes to install
Linux. And the package includes alternatives to MS Word, Powerpoint
and Excel.
ASTI is giving UP several copies of Bayanihan, with permission to
replicate it for as many computers as we want. “Permission” is an
understatement: ASTI encourages us to propagate it. Ang layunin
ay wasakin ang kontrol ng Microsoft at iba pang ganid na software
companies.
Nagbabalak sana kami ni Dr. Jay Sabido (propesor ng UP at kasalukuyang
director ng ASTI) na magsponsor ng “Linux versus Windows” debate.
Pero nahihirapan kaming maghanap ng tagapagsalita para sa Windows.
Nasaan na ang mga tumututol sa Linux? Hinahamon namin kayong ipagtanggol
si Bill Gates!
Bandwidth
and Pornography
Marami rin daw ang salungat sa aming Acceptable Use Policy. We are
being charged with inconsistency. While claiming to promote computer-
and Internet-literacy, the critics point out that we are restricting
access to certain Internet websites. Is this an affront to freedom?
At certain times of the day – the times when most of us would like
to use the Internet – we notice that entering the UP website and
downloading materials is painfully slow. That is because our bandwidth
is limited. Since I took over we have increased our bandwidth at
considerable expense, yet it did not take long before the line got
congested again. More so when we installed more computers with Internet
access and started to give email accounts to all students who apply.
The critics presumably want us to keep on increasing our bandwidth.
Never mind the expense. This is probably an extension of the hackneyed
argument that government has the responsibility to provide free
education because education is a right, not a privilege!
We believe the wiser option is to limit Internet usage to educational
purposes. We do not mean to restrict the freedom to use the Internet
for research and other education-related activities. Quite the contrary,
we want to make access faster. We are merely restricting the privilege
of peeping into pornographic websites, playing games and downloading
movies. This is not out of prudery but of prudence.
I was told that more than half (as much as 70%) of our available
bandwidth is consumed by peeping toms who love pornography. I look
at this not as a moral issue but a political one: should we allow
the peeping toms to make the lives more difficult for the serious
scholars?
Under our Acceptable Use Policy, fine arts students who have a legitimate
reason to admire nude beauties and music and film students who need
MP3 materials can request for exemption. That will free a lot of
bandwidth.
|